Democrats in House pass competitiveness bill, while Republicans force budget delays


ChuckSchumer ContinuingResolution defensespending House MitchMcConnell NancyPelosi Omnibus RichardShelby Senate

It’s 14 days until funding for government expires, and it seems to be another case of one step forward, two steps back with Republicans. On Wednesday, Republicans presented a counteroffer for federal spending over the rest of the 2022 fiscal year, and now they seem to be yanking it back. That could be because Republicans made a completely unserious, trollish offer and never really intended to help govern. There also could be real, principled disagreements, but probably not.

Because Republicans dragged out the appropriations process for the entirety of 2021, the Biden administration is still operating under the last Trump budget, and Republicans like it that way. They’ve openly talked about stretching this process out past the midterm elections since they have a good chance of taking the chamber back, and thus continue to force Biden to abide by their spending limits for the entirety of his first term. So it looks like they are going to force another stopgap funding measure to keep government running after Feb. 18.

“I think we’re probably headed that direction anyway, whether it’s going to be a longer one or a shorter one,” Senate Appropriations Ranking Member Richard Shelby said Thursday. “And that would depend on the leadership … on where we are, if we are anywhere in our negotiations.” That was after he dropped the Republicans’ offer on Democrats just before a scheduled meeting on Wednesday between the “four corners”—the Democratic chair and Republican ranking members of both chambers’ appropriations committees. That meeting was postponed so Democrats could review the offer and has not been rescheduled yet. That sure does look like a delaying tactic by the GOP.

Democrats are arguing for a larger percentage increase in nondefense spending since it was cut drastically under the former guy and Republican Senate, and has not kept pace with increases in Pentagon spending. Republicans are demanding “parity”—the same percentage increase for both sides.

Congress has already agreed to a $778 billion in the 2022 defense authorization bill, some $28 billion over what the Pentagon had even asked for, and 5% more than 2021 fiscal year funding level. That bill, signed by President Joe Biden in December, sets spending levels for the Pentagon but doesn’t actually give them the money to start writing checks without the appropriations bill they’re haggling over now. Republicans want even more than that authorization for the Pentagon’s appropriation.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wasn’t conceding that they’re headed for another continuing resolution as of Thursday. “Right now, we are going back and forth with offers between the Democrats and Republicans and … we’re hoping to reach a deal on a topline very soon on that,” she said at her weekly news conference. The topline refers to the spending cap on defense and nondefense spending.

However, the House is scheduled to be in recess after Wednesday of next week for the remainder of the month, meaning an agreement for the omnibus spending bill would have to be struck by Monday, which is not going to happen. The omnibus spending bill would include 12 separate appropriations bills, a massive undertaking. So the House is preparing to pass another stopgap continuing resolution (CR) next Tuesday.

Sources told Roll Call that it would likely be a three-week funding measure, but it will only move to the floor if the topline agreement is reached by then. That could be an indication that there’s been some progress in negotiations. It could also be Republicans stringing Democrats along because they can. “Negotiations are continuing to make good progress on an appropriations framework,” said Evan Hollander, a spokesman for House Appropriations Committee Democrats. “A CR will only be entertained to provide additional time to finalize legislation after a topline agreement is reached.”

Republicans, however, are making no promises about anything. “If it’s a short-term [CR], that would mean probably that we’re making some progress, real progress,” Shelby said. “If it’s longer, we might go … for the rest of the year.”

That’s despite repeated warnings from Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin about the need to get the appropriations done. In early December, when Congress passed the continuing resolution that is about to expire, he said that a long-term stopgap bill would create serious problems for the Pentagon. “A full-year CR would be a fiscally unsound way of funding the Department of Defense and government as a whole,” he said. “It would misalign billions of dollars in resources in a manner inconsistent with evolving threats and the national security landscape, which would erode the U.S. military advantage relative to China, impede our ability to innovate and modernize, degrade readiness, and hurt our people and their families.”

Austin briefed senators Thursday with the same message. Coming out of that briefing, Sen. Chris Murphy said: “We can’t be anchored with a CR as they’re trying to be nimble in Eastern Europe.” He said that Austin’s message to senators was, “Don’t put us on a CR in the middle of a crisis,” adding a CR “would really hurt them right now.”

Meanwhile, the House finished out the week on a high note, passing the science and technology bill designed to help America’s semiconductor chip industry better compete with China in a 222-210 vote. The Senate passed its own version of this bill last year in 68-32 bipartisan vote. The two bills will have to be reconciled, something Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell won’t make easy:  “The House bill is a partisan boondoggle loaded with left-wing social spending policies that are entirely unrelated to promoting U.S. competitiveness with China.”

Related stories

With a third of the fiscal year gone and a Feb. 18 deadline, Republicans make offer on spending bill

Sleeper bill aimed at easing supply chain woes has broad public support, actual chance of passing

Budget process explainer: How Senate Republicans are going to make the next weeks and months hell for all of us